Remove 2002 Remove Forecasting Remove Measurement Remove Risk
article thumbnail

ML internals: Synthetic Minority Oversampling (SMOTE) Technique

Domino Data Lab

This renders measures like classification accuracy meaningless. In their 2002 paper Chawla et al. 2002) have performed a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of SMOTE- based up-sampling. 2002) provide an example that illustrates the modifications. Generation of artificial examples. Chawla et al., Chawla et al.,

article thumbnail

Themes and Conferences per Pacoid, Episode 10

Domino Data Lab

Trying to dissect a model to divine an interpretation of its results is a good way to throw away much of the crucial information – especially about non-automated inputs and decisions going into our workflows – that will be required to mitigate existential risk. Measure how these decisions vary across your population.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Unintentional data

The Unofficial Google Data Science Blog

Of course, exploratory analysis of big unintentional data puts us squarely at risk for these types of mistakes. But this does not mean that the slice will continue to exhibit an extreme value on this measurement in the future. Controlling the Type I error necessarily comes at the expense of increasing the risk of a Type II error.

article thumbnail

SOX Compliance Guide

Jet Global

We’ve created a comprehensive guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, also known as the SOX Act, to help you understand what’s in the act and why it’s important for your organization to have strong access controls and SOX compliant practices. What is SOX Compliance? Bush in July of the same year.